home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT0335>
- <title>
- Mar. 21, 1994: The Political Interest
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Mar. 21, 1994 Hard Times For Hillary
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- THE POLITICAL INTEREST, Page 37
- Caught In The Web
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By Michael Kramer
- </p>
- <p> The press routinely describes him as a "central figure" in
- the scandal. "He should be fired," says Republican Senator Al
- D'Amato. Or at least put "out of the picture" on an unpaid leave
- of absence, said Republican Senate Leader Bob Dole last Friday.
- The target of these attacks is Deputy Treasury Secretary Roger
- Altman, the latest Clinton Administration official caught in
- the Whitewater affair's web of fact and innuendo.
- </p>
- <p> Political trouble threatens all in its path indiscriminately.
- Public officials served with subpoenas suffer tarnished reputations
- no matter the ultimate result--which is why distinctions should
- be drawn. Where does Altman fit?
- </p>
- <p> With impressive government experience already behind him, Altman
- probably felt confident that he knew the rules of the game when
- he joined Clinton last year. As Jimmy Carter's Assistant Treasury
- Secretary, Altman helped engineer the Chrysler bailout. Thanks
- to his talent and good luck (he and Clinton became friends in
- college), Altman is now Lloyd Bentsen's understudy. He is also
- acting head of the Resolution Trust Corporation, an assignment
- he accepted to fill a temporary vacancy in the RTC's chairmanship.
- This is the chore that has sullied him.
- </p>
- <p> The job is particularly sensitive because the agency is trying
- to recapture money lost from failed savings and loans like Madison
- Guaranty of Little Rock, the institution with ties to the Clintons'
- hapless Whitewater Development Corp. As a result of Altman's
- congressional testimony, the public now knows that Treasury
- officials held three meetings with White House aides to discuss
- the RTC's Madison investigation. Administration officials confirm
- that Altman didn't know about the first two. Those became public
- after Altman acknowledged that he himself called the third for
- last Feb. 2, a session he describes as a "brief heads-up" designed
- to tell the White House what procedures the RTC would follow
- before the statute of limitations on potential lawsuits involving
- Madison expired at the end of that month. (Congress extended
- the statute's deadline shortly thereafter.) Altman has sworn
- that he didn't communicate anything about the substance of the
- RTC's Madison inquiry. He couldn't have done so, he says, because
- he has purposely avoided knowledge of the RTC's cases. So far,
- no evidence disputes his contention.
- </p>
- <p> What's most significant in weighing Altman's culpability is
- his actions before the White House meeting. Unlike those involved
- in the other White House sessions, Altman sought to avoid any
- impropriety, or even its appearance, by clearing his meeting
- in advance with Treasury's ethics office. The question: Would
- it be proper to convey the innocuous facts regarding the statute
- of limitations--facts that had already been provided to inquiring
- congressional staff members? Assured there was no problem, Altman
- proceeded.
- </p>
- <p> On Feb. 24, Altman told Congress about his Feb. 2 meeting. Republicans
- responded predictably, charging improper conduct. On the following
- day, Altman recused himself from any further RTC decisions involving
- Madison, even though Treasury and RTC ethics officials say he
- had no legal obligation to do so. Unsubstantiated reports allege
- that Altman sought the advice of White House aides before his
- recusal. He denies that charge, and Administration officials
- support him.
- </p>
- <p> Where does Altman stand now? Under a cloud. Too few news reports
- mention that Altman's meeting was cleared by Treasury's ethics
- office; too many critics ignore his admission that despite such
- clearance, the meeting should not have occurred. So, fault Altman
- for political naivete but, unless new information surfaces,
- not for venality. A lot about Whitewater smells. Altman doesn't.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-